NewsTrust - Blog Archive

Our new Truthsquad pilot

This week, we are excited to announce a new pilot for Truthsquad, the pro-am fact-checking network we are developing with the Center for Public Integrity. As stated in our last update on this blog, we have created a new user experience for fact-checking claims and will be testing it with a weekly truthsquad on our NewsTrust pilot site, through mid-October.

We hope you will participate actively in this short pilot, to help us improve this new service. To get started, can you join the Truthsquad and help fact-check one of these claims? (UPDATED 10-05-2011)

Construction workers are "paying a higher tax rate than somebody pulling in $50 million a year."
By Barack Obama, U.S. president (D)
Is this TRUE or FALSE?

Can you join our truthsquad and help verify this claim? Be sure to read the links to the right of our claim pages and add more links, if you come across any good factual evidence. Also note that we now have a wider range of options for your answers -- as described in the section below. To find out more, read the section below and check our Truthsquad FAQ.

What should we fact-check next? What do you think of our new fact-checking tool? How can we improve this service? Please email us to share your feedback.

We have now concluded our truthsquad of an earlier GOP debate claim by Rick Perry that "the federal government has not engaged in (border security) at all." Our finding: FALSE. We found overwhelming evidence that the federal government has devoted significant resources to stop illegal crossings of the U.S Mexico border, and has dramatically increased its border patrol efforts in recent years.

We also concluded a fact-check of another GOP debate claim by Mitt Romney that President Obama President Obama "went around the world and apologized for America". Our finding: FALSE. We could not find any factual evidence to support this frequent GOP claim about Obama's so-called "apology tour."

We would like to thank all of the NewsTrust members who have contributed to this pilot so far. We really appreciate all of your great insights and hope you are getting as much from this experience as we are. The more we dig together, the more we learn as a community.

If haven't participated yet, give it a try, before our pilot ends next week. It's a really effective way for citizens like us to get better informed about important issues, in collaboration with experienced journalists. Hope to see you on Truthsquad.com!

   

Our new fact-checking form

Here's a quick guide on how to fact-check a claim on Truthsquad. For more tips, check our FAQ.

1. Check the facts
Before you answer, read the links on the right to learn more about this claim. These related stories are posted by our editors and community, and may provide useful factual evidence on this topic. Some of these links support this claim, some oppose it, others are neutral. The more links you read, review or add, the more your answer will count. To rate these links, click on their 'Review' buttons. Review them carefully for quality, accuracy, fairness and sourcing. To post new links, click Add a link.

2. Rate the claim
Once you have checked the facts and reached a decision, click on the slider to rate this claim: is it true or false? or somewhere in between?

Pick an answer from one of these five rating choices:

For more choices, click on 'Other options' where you can pick one of these answers:

Select 'In progress' if you need more time, 'Not sure' if you can't make up your mind, 'Cannot verify' if you can't find reliable facts to verify this claim, and 'Fiction' if you think this claim is a total fabrication, with no factual evidence at all. Only that last answer counts as a rating, the others are not counted.

Once you've picked an answer, it will be posted on this page, along with other answers from our community. You can change your answer at any time.

3. Add a note 
After you've rated the claim, add a note to explain your decision. Focus on facts, not opinions -- and cite your sources. Please be civil (see our guidelines). When you're done, click the 'Save' button. If you like, you can also add a link to factual evidence that support or oppose this claim.

4. Learn more
For more detailed help, check our Truthsquad FAQ.

For more information about this project, check our Truthsquad Overview page -- and the recent articles in The Atlantic and Nieman Journalism Lab.

To learn more about fact checking and journalism, check out these guides:

• Guide to Fact-checking from PolitiFact (video)
• Tools of the Trade from FactCheck.org
• Crap Detection 101 from Howard Rheingold (NewsTrust board member)
• Think Like A Journalist from Michael Bugeja (NewsTrust advisor)

Our goal for this project is to give you new tools for checking information on the web — and help us learn to separate fact from fiction, with the guidance of professionals.

See you on the Truthsquad pilot site!

Truthsquad Update

This week, we would like to give you a quick update on Truthsquad, the pro-am fact-checking network we are developing with the Center for Public Integrity.

We spent the summer fundraising, signing up new partners -- and designing a new user experience, which we will be introducing next Wednesday. We hope you will participate actively in next week's extended pilot, to help us test and improve this new service. For more info about Truthsquad, visit the Truthsquad pilot site and sign up, so we can inform you when our new service launches.

Truthsquad aims to revolutionize the field of fact checking by combining the best practices of crowdsourcing with the knowledge of a large nonprofit newsroom and the reach of major online news partners. This new initiative empowers citizens to collaborate with journalists to fact-check controversial claims from politicians and newsmakers. Participants are invited to post questionable claims online, research factual evidence supporting or opposing these claims, and verify their accuracy as a community, with professional oversight.

With the help of our community, we aim to launch Truthsquad.com as a daily service by early 2012. Our goal is to provide new ways to find accurate information and verify suspicious claims on our site and widgets -- featuring our own findings, as well as promoting the work of other trusted research organizations like FactCheck.org, PolitiFact and the Washington Post.

To learn more about our next steps, read the recent articles in The Atlantic and Nieman Journalism Lab.

We are encouraged to witness the rise of a new fact-checking movement, as more journalists join forces to verify claims from politicians -- and expose misinformation during the 2012 elections. The next step is to give citizens a voice in that process, which is what Truthsquad is all about. Stay tuned for more …

 

Fact-checking the GOP Debate 
In the meantime, we thought you would enjoy these links to some great fact-checks on the recent GOP debate, from a wide range of trusted sources. How did the fact-checkers cover the CNN Tea Party Express debate? Compare these reports:

• FactCheck: CNN/Tea Party Debate

• PolitiFact: Fact-checking the CNN/Tea Party Express GOP debate

• Washington Post: Fact checking the CNN and Tea Party Express debate

• Associated Press: GOP debate fact check: A look at the record

• New York Times: Fact Check: Social Security, Health Care and More

• CNN Politics: Fact Check: Did the stimulus create “zero” jobs?

Review more fact-checks (and post your own) on this special feed from Google News.

See you next week on the Truthsquad pilot site!

 

Our final report on NewsTrust Baltimore

Here is our final report overview on NewsTrust Baltimore, our local news experiment. In this last report, we summarize our activities on this multifaceted project and share some of our key findings about Baltimore's news ecosystem, the impact of our curation and education services on the local community and much more. The pilot overview and our key findings are excerpted below. 

 

  

Overview

NewsTrust Baltimore was a local news experiment designed to help Baltimore residents find and share good journalism about their community -- and to teach college and high school students to separate fact from fiction online.

This six-month pilot took place in Baltimore, Md., from February to July 2011. It was organized by NewsTrust Communications, a nonprofit social news service, with funding from the Open Society Foundations, a philanthropic organization promoting human rights, justice and accountability.

In this report, we will summarize our activities on this multifaceted project and share some of our key findings, along with practical tips for creating other local news sites based on our tools and methodologies. 

Our goal for this experiment was to help Baltimore residents – particularly college and high school students -- become better informed and more engaged about local issues. Throughout this pilot, participants learned how to tell apart good journalism from misinformation and how to become more discerning citizens and news consumers.

NewsTrust Baltimore featured some of the best news coverage in Baltimore, selected from a wide range of local online, print and broadcast outlets. Our pilot website provided what we call "a guide to good local journalism" -- a unique social network where our staff and community evaluated the local news ecosystem and identified its most reliable sources.

NewsTrust editors curated the site daily, posting news stories for review on a variety of local topics. Community members were invited to rate these stories and discuss their quality, in collaboration with NewsTrust staff. Their top-rated stories were promoted around the clock on this virtual news hub about Baltimore.

For this project, NewsTrust partnered with over 20 local news organizations, including The Baltimore Sun, Baltimore magazine, the Marc Steiner Show (WEAA-FM), Urbanite magazine and WYPR-FM, as well as online sites such as the Baltimore Brew, Center Maryland and Baltimore-area Patch sites. These media partners invited their audiences to participate in this interactive quest, and many included NewsTrust feeds and widgets on their websites.

We also partnered with several local colleges and high schools, including Towson University, the University of Maryland, Morgan State University, the Baltimore Freedom Academy and Wide Angle Youth Media. These educational partners used NewsTrust to help their students develop literacy skills by rating the news, earning certificates for their work.

With the help of our partners, we served more than 21,048 unique visitors and signed up 535 members, including local citizens, journalists, educators, students and community leaders. Our findings suggest that this community-based social network improved the way participants find their local news and helped participants become better informed citizens.

 

Findings

We learned a great deal from this experiment. Here are some of our key takeaways.

Baltimore's news ecosystem is growing

The NewsTrust pilot enabled us to take the pulse of the local news media in Baltimore. We were pleased to discover a thriving news ecosystem, with a growing independent scene that complements the work of mainstream media organizations. Traditional forms of newsgathering are integrating with these new ways to share public information, which bodes well for the future of local journalism.

During our pilot, we identified dozens of reliable news sources, from over 120 publications, many of which our members hadn't heard of before. Our first map of Baltimore's media landscape can help residents learn more about their sources of local news, along with their strengths and weaknesses. The same process could be used for other cities, to survey their local news media with a focus on journalistic quality.

Read more in our blog report: "Mapping Baltimore's news ecosystem".   

 

A curated feed of local journalism is a useful service

NewsTrust Baltimore helped residents find good journalism about their city, all in one place. Our staff curated the news daily and posted new stories for review on the site, from a variety of local sources. During our six-month pilot, we served 140,146 page views on our site, and users read 7,550 news stories and opinion pieces.

Overall traffic to our site and widgets was steady throughout, and more than 60 percent of survey respondents said they found the service useful, even when they did not participate actively. Overall, NewsTrust's collaborative evaluation tools, combined with daily curation by our experienced staff, proved particularly effective for surfacing good journalism in Baltimore. 

Read more in our blog report: "Finding good journalism in Baltimore".   

 

Review tools help students separate fact from fiction

Our educational programs and review tools helped more than 250 students become more critical readers and informed citizens. We worked with a dozen local schools and nonprofits to engage their students to review stories on our site and to learn to tell the difference between good and bad journalism.

As a result, 79 percent of the students in our college study group passed our news literacy test. We were more effective in universities than high schools, and we need to design new courses for younger students with low literacy levels. But overall, educators said they found our service effective in helping the next generation of news consumers learn to separate fact from fiction.

Read more in our blog report: "Teaching and building community".   

 

Social news builds community, online and offline

NewsTrust Baltimore brought together a diverse community of citizens, journalists, students and educators to learn about local issues and how they're covered by news organizations. Online, our pilot site attracted 21,048 unique visitors, with 535 new members generating 3,582 story reviews in just six months.

But we also engaged participants through a variety of offline events, such as meetups, presentations and training sessions. By combining our online social news network with face-to-face meetings, we helped our members make new connections that might not have happened otherwise -- as well as to develop existing relationships. This ability to meet in person is a unique benefit of hosting a local site, and it stands in contrast with our national site, where our exchanges have been mostly virtual so far. 

Read more in our blog report: "Teaching and building community".    

 

A diverse team is a key ingredient

Building a social network is a team sport, which requires a wide range of skills. For this project, we were very lucky to work with a world-class team in Baltimore with very diverse talents: local editor Mary Hartney (former editor at The Baltimore Sun), community manager Gin Ferrara (former media educator at Wide Angle Youth Media) and writer/researcher Andrew Hazlett (formerly with the National Endowment for the Humanities).

Our national team supported their work and included managing editor Jon Mitchell (Brown University) and engineering manager Subramanya Sastry (University of Wisconsin), with contributions from technology advisor David Fox (Lucasfilm), media advisor Evelyn Messinger (Citizens Channel) and visual designer Caleb Waldorf (The Public School).

Together, they delivered a high-quality service with modest resources, and we all enjoyed a close collaboration. Much of this report is based on earlier posts and observations from our team, which were published on the NewsTrust Baltimore blog during our experiment and which are referenced with links throughout this document. We encourage you to read these full reports at bmoreblog.newstrust.net to get a sense of the unique contributions made by each team member in making this pilot possible.

We were also privileged to collaborate with so many great partners and members who generously contributed time and resources to participate in our experiment. We hope that they got as much from it as we did and that our findings will help them and other communities discover even better ways to find and share good local journalism.  

Read our staff observations on our blog: "Reflections on NewsTrust Baltimore".   

 

Local sustainability remains a challenge

We are deeply grateful to Lori McGlinchey, Diana Morris and Debra Rubino at the Open Society Foundations and the Open Society Institute - Baltimore for making this experiment possible; we couldn't have done it without their financial, strategic and logistical support.

We wish we could have discovered a viable revenue model to offer NewsTrust Baltimore as an ongoing service beyond our six-month pilot. But local foundations we spoke to had other priorities, most schools were not ready to pay for our services, and the site did not generate enough traffic to sell ads or subscriptions.

So despite this pilot's many positive outcomes, a longer-term investment would be needed to make this local service sustainable. These sustainability issues could prove to be the most difficult challenge for local news startups to solve -- and might require a close coordination between philanthropic, government, school and business communities.

 Many thanks to all of our partners and community members for their great contributions to this experiment. We hope they got as much from it as we did and that our findings will help them and other communities discover even better ways to find and share good local journalism online. Enjoy!

 

Fabrice Florin
Executive Director and Founder
NewsTrust Communications

 

P.S.: This blog post only contains the first section of our final report, which is available upon request. Be sure to check our other reports about the NewsTrust Baltimore pilot, which include an analysis of the Baltimore news ecosystem, an editorial report, an educational and community report, final stats and survey results, as well as personal observations from our staff and information about NewsTrust's new direction.

P.P.S.: Also check out these stories about NewsTrust Baltimore:

• An Experiment in Civility - Columbia Journalism Review - By Bruce Wallace

• Best Media Watchdog Experiment - City Paper - Nice recognition from a trusted local source

• NewsTrust Baltimore Findings - WYPR - Interview with Fabrice Florin and Mary Hartney

(UPDATED June 6, 2018)