« Smart Feeds Launches Today! | Main | Afghanistan News Hunt Results »

Sparring Opinions: Prosecuting Torture

Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate whether harsh treatment of suspected terrorists by CIA interrogators constituted illegal torture. Holder's move came in conjunction with the release of a CIA report (pdf) on the agency's interrogation program from 2001-2003. In today's Sparring Opinions, we're comparing two blog posts that take opposite views on this issue.

Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald quoted extensively from the CIA report to make the case that the Department of Justice should prosecute both interrogators and their superiors who abused detainees. "As stomach-turning as these individual acts of sadism are," he said, "it is far worse to consider that only low-level interrogators will suffer consequences while those who were truly responsible -- the criminally depraved leaders and lawyers who ordered and authorized it -- will be protected."

Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, however, used quotes from the same report to show that the CIA's harsh interrogations provided valuable information that helped prevent terrorist attacks. "Reasonable people can – and do – disagree about the morality of using [enhanced interrogation techniques]. But only the most accomplished resister could continue to claim that they were not effective."

Which of these Sparring Opinions is more compelling? Weigh in by adding your review to these two stories:

What every American should be made to learn about the IG torture report - Salon

Did they work? - Weekly Standard


-- Derek Hawkins

Share/Save/Bookmark

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834861f6869e20120a51c9cb8970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sparring Opinions: Prosecuting Torture:

Comments

Prosecute at both "interrogators" and their superiors for anything less would be a miscarriage of justice. It's positively hypocritical for the same voices who criticized now Justice Sotomejor invoking even-handed, blind justice as a standard for all now equivocate on the point of those who carried out the agenda of Neo-Con idealism. Please square that twisted knot Weekly Standard editorialists. Such a feat would be worthy of Circe de Soleir.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

About NewsTrust.net

  • NewsTrust.net helps people find good journalism online. Our web review tools let you rate the news based on journalistic quality, not just popularity. Based on member ratings, we feature a daily selection of top rated news and opinions on our free site. We're non-profit, non-partisan, and committed to helping citizens make informed decisions about democracy. More »

Top Stories on NewsTrust